Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 19:43:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8950491B3B19E7C705873F991026C585FEBE2079E0896FE0FF13FB48B6CB0428
Participant Details

Original Note:

AI-generated intellectual property cannot be copyrighted. "Only works with human authors can receive copyrights, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said on Friday, affirming the Copyright Office's rejection of an application..." https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696243954210193493
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8950491B3B19E7C705873F991026C585FEBE2079E0896FE0FF13FB48B6CB0428
  • createdAtMillis - 1693511018187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16962439542101934938950491B3B19E7C705873F991026C585FEBE2079E0896FE0FF13FB48B6CB0428