Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-30 06:58:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6045DBF98F0CEEB6172A04B9897698D85D6B661268070DD8355E59C38A0CD509
Participant Details

Original Note:

AI-generated intellectual property cannot be copyrighted. "Only works with human authors can receive copyrights, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said on Friday, affirming the Copyright Office's rejection of an application..." https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696243954210193493
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6045DBF98F0CEEB6172A04B9897698D85D6B661268070DD8355E59C38A0CD509
  • createdAtMillis - 1693378739183
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16962439542101934936045DBF98F0CEEB6172A04B9897698D85D6B661268070DD8355E59C38A0CD509