Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 20:08:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08F6EB5101760950EF470CE332B9343C4798D6440C758C3A5429C3BC1CC4B678
Participant Details

Original Note:

AI-generated intellectual property cannot be copyrighted. "Only works with human authors can receive copyrights, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell said on Friday, affirming the Copyright Office's rejection of an application..." https://www.reuters.com/legal/ai-generated-art-cannot-receive-copyrights-us-court-says-2023-08-21/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696243954210193493
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08F6EB5101760950EF470CE332B9343C4798D6440C758C3A5429C3BC1CC4B678
  • createdAtMillis - 1693253322262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169624395421019349308F6EB5101760950EF470CE332B9343C4798D6440C758C3A5429C3BC1CC4B678