Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 12:09:15 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C576C69921E62FE8A215E3E3B2D4890AD35AFD197F9FDD44F3DEECEA602CF382
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Illegal content is 1)not protected by freedom of speech (Article 11)and 2)not defined in the DSA" Since "illegal content is not defined", they will use this law, like in the past, to make dissent criminal, by they'r own "not defined illegal content" imagined in time definition.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696182903632167260
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C576C69921E62FE8A215E3E3B2D4890AD35AFD197F9FDD44F3DEECEA602CF382
  • createdAtMillis - 1693310955690
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1696182903632167260C576C69921E62FE8A215E3E3B2D4890AD35AFD197F9FDD44F3DEECEA602CF382