Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 18:39:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AFDD4EF497E5A43F6EAAB14DB3115EE55D33C78DC0E25EB78B2CE5C0A44A8F4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Illegal content is 1)not protected by freedom of speech (Article 11)and 2)not defined in the DSA" Since "illegal content is not defined", they will use this law, like in the past, to make dissent criminal, by they'r own "not defined illegal content" imagined in time definition.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696182903632167260
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AFDD4EF497E5A43F6EAAB14DB3115EE55D33C78DC0E25EB78B2CE5C0A44A8F4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1693334342297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1696182903632167260AFDD4EF497E5A43F6EAAB14DB3115EE55D33C78DC0E25EB78B2CE5C0A44A8F4A