Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-31 19:11:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Illegal content is 1)not protected by freedom of speech (Article 11)and 2)not defined in the DSA" Since "illegal content is not defined", they will use this law, like in the past, to make dissent criminal, by they'r own "not defined illegal content" imagined in time definition.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696182903632167260
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693509117119
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169618290363216726043CDA3E79E7F20B741E31B47D39944CE817C4DEA1BFC9275920065347875C86E