Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 19:58:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC7E1ECD47EBD5B752A9E425AF9296386D8E83A2C923F92D1F4A258954E20208
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://stanfordreview.org/science-california-lockdown-evidence/ History has demonstrated that consensus based scientific methodology is flawed when used as an argument for accepting hypothesis as truth. Dr. Peterson is merely is turning the tables upon people who use consensus (97%) rather than evidence for verification of hypothesis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696137302987166050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC7E1ECD47EBD5B752A9E425AF9296386D8E83A2C923F92D1F4A258954E20208
  • createdAtMillis - 1693252722616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1696137302987166050EC7E1ECD47EBD5B752A9E425AF9296386D8E83A2C923F92D1F4A258954E20208