Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 20:32:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 94F620141E96854307A4897A443A11D61FAD0C746FC487282293D4608A2504D2
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://stanfordreview.org/science-california-lockdown-evidence/ History has demonstrated that consensus based scientific methodology is flawed when used as an argument for accepting hypothesis as truth. Dr. Peterson is merely is turning the tables upon people who use consensus (97%) rather than evidence for verification of hypothesis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696137302987166050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 94F620141E96854307A4897A443A11D61FAD0C746FC487282293D4608A2504D2
  • createdAtMillis - 1693773150017
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169613730298716605094F620141E96854307A4897A443A11D61FAD0C746FC487282293D4608A2504D2