Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 02:05:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36F1CD610BDAB5855C60C3A6A01B5A43AE40C9971281B174FE904C9375EE003B
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://stanfordreview.org/science-california-lockdown-evidence/ History has demonstrated that consensus based scientific methodology is flawed when used as an argument for accepting hypothesis as truth. Dr. Peterson is merely is turning the tables upon people who use consensus (97%) rather than evidence for verification of hypothesis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696137302987166050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36F1CD610BDAB5855C60C3A6A01B5A43AE40C9971281B174FE904C9375EE003B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693274701230
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169613730298716605036F1CD610BDAB5855C60C3A6A01B5A43AE40C9971281B174FE904C9375EE003B