Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 20:24:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://stanfordreview.org/science-california-lockdown-evidence/ History has demonstrated that consensus based scientific methodology is flawed when used as an argument for accepting hypothesis as truth. Dr. Peterson is merely is turning the tables upon people who use consensus (97%) rather than evidence for verification of hypothesis.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696137302987166050
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 13409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F
  • createdAtMillis - 1693340656601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169613730298716605013409FA78F24B2801B3ACD5E7A790984DD659D7EF087CD927B5DC77154516B2F