Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 09:44:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D5EC54C21FFA408DEE93DF3BE8D2134C5AE841394042D0F229CB5E095E8B96B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. On peut déplorer la pratique des titres de presse ambigu pour accrocher un potentiel lecteur. Mais en l'occurence ici chaque mot recouvre bien le fond de l'article. La thèse du rapace semble bien improbable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1696084726690320647
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D5EC54C21FFA408DEE93DF3BE8D2134C5AE841394042D0F229CB5E095E8B96B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693215862048
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16960847266903206472D5EC54C21FFA408DEE93DF3BE8D2134C5AE841394042D0F229CB5E095E8B96B