Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 13:47:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4631DFA451588E0D904F8737D1E3D31620E6AC17A83BB0B3138C9E4D8D5F3B5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

A IAEA, uma instituição composta por 177 países, com peritos na área de ciências nucleares, analisou estudos efetuados em laboratórios de várias nações e concluíu que a operação é segura. FAQ da IAEA: https://www.iaea.org/topics/response/fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-accident/fukushima-daiichi-alps-treated-water-discharge/faq Relatório sobre o processo: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/first_interlaboratory_comparison_on_the_determination_of_radionuclides_in_alps_treated_water.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi2oomD_P2AAxW5QaQEHe7PDl4QFnoECBEQAQ&usg=AOvVaw05Lw85Gf_niZDabUd8moMz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695939177542566285
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4631DFA451588E0D904F8737D1E3D31620E6AC17A83BB0B3138C9E4D8D5F3B5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1693230436844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16959391775425662854631DFA451588E0D904F8737D1E3D31620E6AC17A83BB0B3138C9E4D8D5F3B5C