Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 11:44:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A1FF7D2D5FD4119E17509F2894BCB287E200045DE5FE7BF464B4C99A6CE3E191
Participant Details

Original Note:

1. Die Darstellung, Schutzgesuche seien nur aufgrund von Artikel 16a GG, den der Post "individuelles Asylrecht" nennt, legal, ist irreführend. (u.a. Genfer Flüchtlingskonvention). 2. Asyl zu beantragen, ist nicht missbräuchlich, unabhängig vom Ausgang des Verfahrens. https://www.bpb.de/themen/migration-integration/zahlen-zu-asyl/265711/asylentscheidungen-und-klagen/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1695938426615308510
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A1FF7D2D5FD4119E17509F2894BCB287E200045DE5FE7BF464B4C99A6CE3E191
createdAtMillis - 1693223091239
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1695938426615308510A1FF7D2D5FD4119E17509F2894BCB287E200045DE5FE7BF464B4C99A6CE3E191