Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 16:33:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

While everyone is entitled to their opinions on the matter, the Supreme Court currently interprets the Second Amendment as granting an individual right to own a firearm. It is not merely the opinion of activists, but current law. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695925249429143728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1693326813699
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695925249429143728D51D22038DCB5B3B70DDDBCDB14D7B627F312DEF81C6F1B13EB37389DC6D13E1