Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 17:26:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44C1497194B2488E72306EB5E9B01E99B615B0184500B4B59514391CB264703B
Participant Details

Original Note:

While everyone is entitled to their opinions on the matter, the Supreme Court currently interprets the Second Amendment as granting an individual right to own a firearm. It is not merely the opinion of activists, but current law. https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695925249429143728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44C1497194B2488E72306EB5E9B01E99B615B0184500B4B59514391CB264703B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693243586921
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 169592524942914372844C1497194B2488E72306EB5E9B01E99B615B0184500B4B59514391CB264703B