Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 20:48:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3EC8B464195D328E249E47C11F251B31BEC73EC49A57F7C22031D3994C778C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'affirmation selon laquelle l'interdiction est anticonstitutionnelle est fausse et mérite une note. Merci à Dynamic Root Condor d'en prendre bonne note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695907167100878849
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3EC8B464195D328E249E47C11F251B31BEC73EC49A57F7C22031D3994C778C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1693255730483
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1695907167100878849F3EC8B464195D328E249E47C11F251B31BEC73EC49A57F7C22031D3994C778C4