Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 21:53:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0639B7E88EC976C3D74D608C64788E2446D3B92EB2C37390C6F95DC8CD277879
Participant Details

Original Note:

L'affirmation selon laquelle l'interdiction est anticonstitutionnelle est fausse et mérite une note. Merci à Dynamic Root Condor d'en prendre bonne note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695907167100878849
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0639B7E88EC976C3D74D608C64788E2446D3B92EB2C37390C6F95DC8CD277879
  • createdAtMillis - 1693173192727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16959071671008788490639B7E88EC976C3D74D608C64788E2446D3B92EB2C37390C6F95DC8CD277879