Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 12:54:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14C44FD056867A2057878298683D77FF412DC5F483C9BD52D8E45D5FC3EE1EDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il The New York Times non sostiene di abolire le elezioni. L'autore dell'editoriale sostiene che si potrebbe sostituire l'elezione dei rappresentanti con l'estrazione a sorte. L'autore propone che tutti si possano candidare a questa estrazione a patto di superare un esame. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/21/opinion/elections-democracy.html https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/08/american-election-frequency-voter-turnout/675054/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695864994838028775
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14C44FD056867A2057878298683D77FF412DC5F483C9BD52D8E45D5FC3EE1EDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1693227267675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169586499483802877514C44FD056867A2057878298683D77FF412DC5F483C9BD52D8E45D5FC3EE1EDE