Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-28 00:47:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 135BBAE575587F03A6E5DA77E055147BC5E37E95E688780B03022C4C7D370606
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il The New York Times non sostiene di abolire le elezioni. L'autore dell'editoriale sostiene che si potrebbe sostituire l'elezione dei rappresentanti con l'estrazione a sorte. L'autore propone che tutti si possano candidare a questa estrazione a patto di superare un esame. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/21/opinion/elections-democracy.html https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/08/american-election-frequency-voter-turnout/675054/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695864994838028775
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 135BBAE575587F03A6E5DA77E055147BC5E37E95E688780B03022C4C7D370606
  • createdAtMillis - 1693183644233
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695864994838028775135BBAE575587F03A6E5DA77E055147BC5E37E95E688780B03022C4C7D370606