Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 16:10:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Stop abusing CN to spread (potentially biased) opinions of one group of "climate scientists" while vilifying another (at minimum equally reliable) group stating the opposite! Provide sources to both sides and let everyone figure it out themselves or CUT THE CRAP! NNN!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695825847767208049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1693152645047
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695825847767208049E579354DDA18CDEBACD08D02F0E9A64C876E3C700BA0642F90CEADAF7DBBC8C5