Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 15:52:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A80344196CBFE567432DAB8E44B9F35A21E178F438A64EF12E3BD4E6E5F47358
Participant Details

Original Note:

Stop abusing CN to spread (potentially biased) opinions of one group of "climate scientists" while vilifying another (at minimum equally reliable) group stating the opposite! Provide sources to both sides and let everyone figure it out themselves or CUT THE CRAP! NNN!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695825847767208049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A80344196CBFE567432DAB8E44B9F35A21E178F438A64EF12E3BD4E6E5F47358
  • createdAtMillis - 1693151575701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695825847767208049A80344196CBFE567432DAB8E44B9F35A21E178F438A64EF12E3BD4E6E5F47358