Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 18:02:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
Participant Details

Original Note:

Stop abusing CN to spread (potentially biased) opinions of one group of "climate scientists" while vilifying another (at minimum equally reliable) group stating the opposite! Provide sources to both sides and let everyone figure it out themselves or CUT THE CRAP! NNN!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695825847767208049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71
  • createdAtMillis - 1693159339410
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695825847767208049A02A5FCA86DDA2B83FE57B8D5DB62556CB5F4DD5393ADE0FE6BF840A09DA2D71