Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 16:29:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48F448D6B5B9D2F860C93D21308177811C4D286903BFA5D8CEA3EB4BC47589DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Stop abusing CN to spread (potentially biased) opinions of one group of "climate scientists" while vilifying another (at minimum equally reliable) group stating the opposite! Provide sources to both sides and let everyone figure it out themselves or CUT THE CRAP! NNN!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695825847767208049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48F448D6B5B9D2F860C93D21308177811C4D286903BFA5D8CEA3EB4BC47589DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1693153752072
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169582584776720804948F448D6B5B9D2F860C93D21308177811C4D286903BFA5D8CEA3EB4BC47589DE