Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 16:17:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40C8E16EE5819ED9BE0B4A9EBBBB5F84091400572F63B1BB75F863E3EE1C984A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Stop abusing CN to spread (potentially biased) opinions of one group of "climate scientists" while vilifying another (at minimum equally reliable) group stating the opposite! Provide sources to both sides and let everyone figure it out themselves or CUT THE CRAP! NNN!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695825847767208049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 40C8E16EE5819ED9BE0B4A9EBBBB5F84091400572F63B1BB75F863E3EE1C984A
  • createdAtMillis - 1693153025776
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169582584776720804940C8E16EE5819ED9BE0B4A9EBBBB5F84091400572F63B1BB75F863E3EE1C984A