Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 02:41:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E07B5532226536CF7C934122945700547B19184BA070E37F166D87387CAE9DEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Fake. No such article exists. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37S1W6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695616657039802568
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E07B5532226536CF7C934122945700547B19184BA070E37F166D87387CAE9DEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1693104092985
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695616657039802568E07B5532226536CF7C934122945700547B19184BA070E37F166D87387CAE9DEE