Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 08:00:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7D8430D96FCE4936294293BA48A712CE065275418AD0D252545FAF4C80EBBD8
Participant Details

Original Note:

FFS, every time with this kinda thing: it is a *personal opinion* if they say "there SHOULD have been a conviction/this person is a murderer/etc." They're not claiming the jury returned a different verdict. It is their opinion. Community Notes are not for opinions. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695546009324024029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A7D8430D96FCE4936294293BA48A712CE065275418AD0D252545FAF4C80EBBD8
  • createdAtMillis - 1693123251941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695546009324024029A7D8430D96FCE4936294293BA48A712CE065275418AD0D252545FAF4C80EBBD8