Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 12:23:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7027A17738D58CC401DF9C55437D5439426028989FDF52BB096E1C978A56FD3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

FFS, every time with this kinda thing: it is a *personal opinion* if they say "there SHOULD have been a conviction/this person is a murderer/etc." They're not claiming the jury returned a different verdict. It is their opinion. Community Notes are not for opinions. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695546009324024029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7027A17738D58CC401DF9C55437D5439426028989FDF52BB096E1C978A56FD3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1693138988727
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16955460093240240297027A17738D58CC401DF9C55437D5439426028989FDF52BB096E1C978A56FD3D