Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 22:33:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF5E9ED567AC0ED458FC3675E476DF0D8071CA6FCC757496104EC0155596AED5
Participant Details

Original Note:

El post omite el hecho de que la condena original del violador expiró hace dos meses y el juez estimó que debía rebajar su condena en dos meses (salió hace cuatro). Así que en cualquier caso, el violador estaría en el momento actual en la calle. https://amp.elmundo.es/andalucia/2023/08/25/64e8c091e4d4d8692d8b45af.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695529601047417164
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF5E9ED567AC0ED458FC3675E476DF0D8071CA6FCC757496104EC0155596AED5
  • createdAtMillis - 1693089229981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1695529601047417164EF5E9ED567AC0ED458FC3675E476DF0D8071CA6FCC757496104EC0155596AED5