Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-02 12:18:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C863AF60C52A0FAFE607FD7687801078C54C1F94D09500A17C4273340475B2BB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN There's a link to the study, no need to explain the study. People can read. If you want to argue semantics do it in the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695508681440285049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C863AF60C52A0FAFE607FD7687801078C54C1F94D09500A17C4273340475B2BB
  • createdAtMillis - 1693657109004
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695508681440285049C863AF60C52A0FAFE607FD7687801078C54C1F94D09500A17C4273340475B2BB