Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 19:30:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 49D2290A95715C041681930EF770E42FA4EF2DF2448AD1AC7118AE9C95B5414F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN There's a link to the study, no need to explain the study. People can read. If you want to argue semantics do it in the comments

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695508681440285049
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 49D2290A95715C041681930EF770E42FA4EF2DF2448AD1AC7118AE9C95B5414F
  • createdAtMillis - 1693164632773
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169550868144028504949D2290A95715C041681930EF770E42FA4EF2DF2448AD1AC7118AE9C95B5414F