Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 20:52:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D30768B8953E269E668E1C58209F9838177A855EDA39744C27455A606C11948
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source linked in the proposed note is relevant, but it does not address several of the reasons @krassenstein gives for his opinion. e.g. "freedom of speech not freedom of reach" algorithms, advertising pressure, etc. so overall it is not helpful.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695499502373781563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D30768B8953E269E668E1C58209F9838177A855EDA39744C27455A606C11948
  • createdAtMillis - 1693083122893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16954995023737815630D30768B8953E269E668E1C58209F9838177A855EDA39744C27455A606C11948