Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 08:11:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02305F1E1F4BF0031E53B5B72D32A04ACBC265FD2C97C964271D63DD711CCF23
Participant Details

Original Note:

The source linked in the proposed note is relevant, but it does not address several of the reasons @krassenstein gives for his opinion. e.g. "freedom of speech not freedom of reach" algorithms, advertising pressure, etc. so overall it is not helpful.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695499502373781563
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02305F1E1F4BF0031E53B5B72D32A04ACBC265FD2C97C964271D63DD711CCF23
  • createdAtMillis - 1693123871341
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169549950237378156302305F1E1F4BF0031E53B5B72D32A04ACBC265FD2C97C964271D63DD711CCF23