Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 01:31:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 428C932B99DFAD79C9151593FA246F967C3F7F4153DCB7DA63516C0B12135897
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note shown on post is opinionated and speculative, showing no direct, concrete, objective evidence that the chain isn’t worth $1.5M, or that it wasn’t bought for that price. CNs is for objectivity not subjectivity, showing supposed subjectively comparable pieces isn’t for CNs

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695479484139307490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 428C932B99DFAD79C9151593FA246F967C3F7F4153DCB7DA63516C0B12135897
  • createdAtMillis - 1693099874262
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695479484139307490428C932B99DFAD79C9151593FA246F967C3F7F4153DCB7DA63516C0B12135897