Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 16:26:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE6CDE85F9131444DDCA5BB63E4FB8253912EB408C6C43866DB7D1747E81E985
Participant Details

Original Note:

El presunto violador hubiera estado en libertad en junio sin beneficios por la Ley de Solo Si Es Sí, por lo que no procede ni siquiera mencionar la ley y mucho menos culpar a la ley de la posible reincidencia de este presunto violador.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695467342161948742
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE6CDE85F9131444DDCA5BB63E4FB8253912EB408C6C43866DB7D1747E81E985
  • createdAtMillis - 1693067212334
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695467342161948742CE6CDE85F9131444DDCA5BB63E4FB8253912EB408C6C43866DB7D1747E81E985