Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-29 10:50:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5B45E2654FAD3BBA0FD230A5226139DFB2DAF967EFD6FEED61F307E5CF451CF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN le motivazioni dicono chiaramente che il paper è stato ritirato perché le conclusioni non sono supportate dai dati https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04386-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695449994839441753
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5B45E2654FAD3BBA0FD230A5226139DFB2DAF967EFD6FEED61F307E5CF451CF
  • createdAtMillis - 1693306225027
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695449994839441753E5B45E2654FAD3BBA0FD230A5226139DFB2DAF967EFD6FEED61F307E5CF451CF