Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 09:40:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0ACCE78242E486E17CAAABAE69810C6AE7C4B9C8FB997079BF342C17BA0027F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cet article n'explique pas que les fact checking serait "100 % corrompu" mais que certaines campagnes ont été financées. https://www.skynews.com.au/business/media/the-fact-check-files-inside-the-secretive-and-lucrative-fact-checking-industry-behind-a-foreignfunded-bid-to-censor-voice-debate/news-story/31915e1eb03b029b86a2f03aac19338b

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695362408250851357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0ACCE78242E486E17CAAABAE69810C6AE7C4B9C8FB997079BF342C17BA0027F
  • createdAtMillis - 1693042859193
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695362408250851357A0ACCE78242E486E17CAAABAE69810C6AE7C4B9C8FB997079BF342C17BA0027F