Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 08:04:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6D99E62C1CCACD217EC800EE8D26AD60E74ED548640F9529FF9347AA7584ADD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge in Germany was not sentenced because of the ruling itself, but because he made a ruling that did not fall into his jurisdiction and it was proven that he pre-planned the case and his ruling. https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Umstrittener-Richter-zu-zwei-Jahren-auf-Bewaehrung-verurteilt-article24344148.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695338056398540981
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6D99E62C1CCACD217EC800EE8D26AD60E74ED548640F9529FF9347AA7584ADD
  • createdAtMillis - 1693037094116
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695338056398540981C6D99E62C1CCACD217EC800EE8D26AD60E74ED548640F9529FF9347AA7584ADD