Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 13:08:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 937533990C0FEFCE396AC3873457C95C0DBCD597D08CD2AFF9AD29BBDEAD0DBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Judge in Germany was not sentenced because of the ruling itself, but because he made a ruling that did not fall into his jurisdiction and it was proven that he pre-planned the case and his ruling. https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Umstrittener-Richter-zu-zwei-Jahren-auf-Bewaehrung-verurteilt-article24344148.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695338056398540981
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 937533990C0FEFCE396AC3873457C95C0DBCD597D08CD2AFF9AD29BBDEAD0DBB
  • createdAtMillis - 1693055297285
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695338056398540981937533990C0FEFCE396AC3873457C95C0DBCD597D08CD2AFF9AD29BBDEAD0DBB