Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 21:42:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2698A3138CED5B0110A7D84E3E9B0FD3CB4C1E717366A83A30677A09BC97B34B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Obviously the best way to pack 16 squares in a larger square is a regular 4x4 packing, as 16 is a square number. This tweet satirizes square packing problem for some other numbers, which have quite unintuitive solutions or best attempts known so far.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695329352827781255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2698A3138CED5B0110A7D84E3E9B0FD3CB4C1E717366A83A30677A09BC97B34B
  • createdAtMillis - 1693086150366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16953293528277812552698A3138CED5B0110A7D84E3E9B0FD3CB4C1E717366A83A30677A09BC97B34B