Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 09:25:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2017AD3DB3E0E5B44D6A76E2D1B62034EB80C24B9CF15C929BF4C4CB005E93B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Obviously the best way to pack 16 squares in a larger square is a regular 4x4 packing, as 16 is a square number. This tweet satirizes square packing problem for some other numbers, which have quite unintuitive solutions or best attempts known so far.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695329352827781255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2017AD3DB3E0E5B44D6A76E2D1B62034EB80C24B9CF15C929BF4C4CB005E93B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1693041936246
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16953293528277812552017AD3DB3E0E5B44D6A76E2D1B62034EB80C24B9CF15C929BF4C4CB005E93B3