Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-17 23:26:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 167ADBED81958BFA1E1F76FE0F513CBF619DFA5C57058ABD36B0769BB5D0B221
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Obviously the best way to pack 16 squares in a larger square is a regular 4x4 packing, as 16 is a square number. This tweet satirizes square packing problem for some other numbers, which have quite unintuitive solutions or best attempts known so far.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695329352827781255
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 167ADBED81958BFA1E1F76FE0F513CBF619DFA5C57058ABD36B0769BB5D0B221
  • createdAtMillis - 1723937166354
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695329352827781255167ADBED81958BFA1E1F76FE0F513CBF619DFA5C57058ABD36B0769BB5D0B221