Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 14:06:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D5ADEB8371CCCD34531CE0F785353C1DF2EDF2E95B3C8B5B7E4BA53314361D64
Participant Details
Original Note:
Peterson argued that statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions". The court concluded that Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6943845
All Note Details