Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 03:16:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 7C73A8160DB75C86C9411ED7F7F37E64E6A236AB038CA4BB3E40248CB83BC678
Participant Details
Original Note:
Peterson argued that statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions". The court concluded that Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6943845
All Note Details