Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 01:02:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 61C76868FDB5ADA45C0EB3B2D14716D58303FA98D74B93AE0BFEDC3E2AB62F73
Participant Details
Original Note:
Peterson argued that statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions". The court concluded that Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6943845
All Note Details