Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 00:59:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0D4FEDE1FEAEE4536A4ADD14EB9AEE1B2D946EA4297B9CB7C6E190FDE6B294AF
Participant Details
Original Note:
Peterson argued that statements were not made in his capacity as a clinical psychologist, but instead were "off-duty opinions". The court concluded that Peterson cannot have it both ways: he cannot speak as a member of a regulated profession without taking responsibility. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6943845
All Note Details