Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 11:01:28 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F7CBFA16CD9B3772840DC3D0CF7046E2C21A25A489EC333A3EAEF1A8AFB8C925
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details