Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 09:40:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3909DAE55D96B73DC253501C0CCE63736B7809724126D99BADC51C841E27E408
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details