Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-26 00:22:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D6104F15200FCA0EA622702F62F088F081EE19393C5618C06978E223336F7FB4
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details