Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 22:29:05 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D2C092E7ECBA12C24701A6AF6BEA73BD3A74F6BDE7D56677020482512E36DD6C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details