Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-08-25 23:00:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 79A4C0C647C7683A521A8E2D786A5F1F25166C44DA2666A7A4B88CDE944FE079
Participant Details
Original Note:
Fox appealed on 4 grounds, including that the original judge erred in not defining the word "racist". The appeal found that the OJ had *not* erred in not defining the word racist. No definition of the word "racist" has come out of either the original judgement or this appeal. https://caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/2023/1000
All Note Details